This Pandemic Was Caused By Science
This Pandemic Was Caused By Science
Former CDC Director responds to his lab leak testimony
Former CDC Director Dr. Redfield followed up his testimony on the origins of COVID-19. Once again affirming “this pandemic was caused by science.”
He appeared on the Hill for an interview. Here are the highlights:
Calls for a renewal of the moratorium banning gain-of-function research.
Warns the “Great Pandemic” is coming — not from a natural spillover event but from gain-of-function research and or intentional bioterrorism. A bird flu virus that is manipulated to transmit human-to-human.
The same Wuhan lab published a study in 2014 where they successfully enabled a coronavirus to bind to human ACE2 receptors.
SARS-CoV-2 has several sequences that are likely the result of gain-of-function research.
The furin cleavage site.
The nucleotide triplet sequence for arginine is for human use - not bat.
The fact that SARS-CoV-2 can barely infect bats but can infect humans provides a lot of evidence that this virus was manipulated.
Research done on SARS-CoV-2 was part of a biodefence program — to create a vaccine vector — but unfortunately escaped.
In September 2019 three odd things happened at the Wuhan Lab (around the same time the first illnesses happened in the area):
Lab management was changed from civilian to military control.
All virus sequences were deleted.
A new ventilation system was installed.
Warns gain-of-function research is currently being done in labs all across the world.
Society should determine if gain-of-function research should continue — if so, it needs to be done in a safe, responsible and effective way.
The interview (part 1) was only 4 minutes long but packed with great information. (part 2-3 are linked at the end)
Fmr. CDC Director Dr. Redfield: "This Pandemic Was Caused by Science"
"I think it was done probably as part of a biodefense program that largely was trying to make a vaccine vector...but unfortunately that virus escaped...probably somewhere in the September [2019] timeframe. I do believe that the most likely answer when we get to the truth is that this pandemic was caused by science, not by a natural spillover event."
People should ‘trust the science’ on this one.
Advantages vs Disadvantages of Gain-of-Function Research
I asked ChatGPT (an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI) what are the advantages and disadvantages of gain-of-function research. This was the response:
Advantages of gain of function research:
Increased understanding of pathogen behavior: Gain of function research can help researchers better understand how pathogens function, how they infect and spread, and how they interact with the host. This understanding can lead to the development of more effective treatments, vaccines, and public health strategies.
Preparation for future pandemics: By studying the behavior of potentially dangerous viruses in a controlled laboratory environment, researchers can gain insights into how to prepare for and respond to future pandemics.
Development of new treatments and vaccines: Gain of function research can help identify new targets for vaccines and treatments that can be developed to counteract the enhanced virulence of a pathogen.
Disadvantages of gain of function research:
Increased risk of accidental release: Gain of function research involves working with potentially dangerous pathogens that have been modified to be more infectious or transmissible. This increases the risk of accidental release of the modified pathogen, which could have serious consequences.
Creation of new pathogens: There is a risk that gain of function research could inadvertently create new pathogens that are more dangerous than the original strain, potentially leading to a new pandemic.
Ethical concerns: Some people have raised ethical concerns about the risks associated with gain of function research and whether it is appropriate to deliberately enhance the virulence of pathogens.
Dual-use potential: The knowledge and techniques developed through gain of function research could potentially be misused for bioterrorism or other nefarious purposes.
Overall, gain of function research can offer important insights into the behavior of pathogens and help us develop more effective treatments and vaccines. However, it is important to carefully weigh the potential risks and benefits and to ensure that adequate safety protocols are in place to minimize the risk of accidental release or misuse.
But what do you think? Should gain-of-function research be stopped? Does the benefit to society outweigh the risk? or is it the biggest threat to humanity?
Thanks for reading everyone!
Part 2:
Part 3 - Responds to Fauci:
Mike Yeadon recently posted his hypothesis that Covid-19 is a construct and never existed as a virus.
His suggestion is all the discussions about the origin of "Covid 19 virus is to obscure that it never existed and to encourage countries to relinquish their control of pandemic response to the WHO that is controlled by China and Bill Gates. This will lead us directly to WEF control and digital currency which will in turn enslave us to beaurocrats who can turn off our financial tap on a whim.
So we know the government is lying to us but which lies are the true lies and which are designed to put us off the scent of their corruption?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-i-dont-believe-there-ever-was-a-covid-virus/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
The absence of meaningful data from the med/gov institutions is obvious malfeasance/ intentional obfuscation. This is disturbing... so the sheep will just go back to their grazing.