Dr. Panda's Newsletter

Share this post

Proven Again: Ivermectin

drpanda.substack.com

Discover more from Dr. Panda's Newsletter

Medicine, science, bioethics, analytics, politics and life
Over 57,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Proven Again: Ivermectin

Recent study shows 72% efficacy in the prevention of COVID-19 infection

Dr Panda
Jan 15, 2023
86
Share this post

Proven Again: Ivermectin

drpanda.substack.com
28
Share

Remember this tweet? Advising you to stop taking ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID?

Twitter avatar for @US_FDA
U.S. FDA @US_FDA
You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.
fda.govWhy You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19Using the Drug ivermectin to treat COVID-19 can be dangerous and even lethal. The FDA has not approved the drug for that purpose.
11:57 AM ∙ Aug 21, 2021
111,941Likes49,097Retweets

Turns out it’s false - like most information coming from The FDA.

Another study was released earlier in the month that shows ivermectin was effective in the prevention of COVID-19 infection. Ivermectin showed a 72% reduction of COVID-19 infection in a study of 399 participants. All participants were unvaccinated, exposed to the virus (contact with a person who had a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection) and took ivermectin tablets for 28 days.

Even better the study had zero unexpected safety signals. Compare that with mRNA that increases your risk of COVID-19 infection and comes with an exhaustive laundry list of adverse events.

Press Release:

The SAIVE Trial (NCT 05305560) is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study, evaluating the safety and efficacy of ivermectin tablets taken orally for 28 days, under the oversight of a U.S. based independent Data Monitoring Committee. The study was conducted in Bulgaria between March and November 2022.

All participants were unvaccinated adults and had been exposed to the virus within 5 days of screening after documented close contact with a person who had a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Participants randomized to ivermectin group showed a highly statistically significant reduction (72%) of laboratory-confirmed infections between baseline and Day 28 (30/200) versus placebo (105/199), the study's primary endpoint, with p<0,0001.

No safety signals related to daily intake of ivermectin, 200 microgram/kg on Day 1 then 100 microgram/kg daily from Day 2 to Day 28 were identified during the study.


Japan, whose population is heavily mRNA vaccinated and masked, unfortunately, are reporting its worst daily COVID death tolls. Each COVID wave is getting worse and worse.

Officials in Japan are baffled.

Takaji Wakita, Chairman of Japan’s Covid Response Advisory Board:

The cause of the rise in Covid deaths is hard to explain.

 Dr. Satoshi Kamayachi, Director of the Japan Medical Association:

There’s a lot we don’t know, and we don’t have evidence.

Dr. Kamayachi, citing the rapid spread of Covid infections as one reason, explained that the majority of those who died were over 60 and many had underlying medical conditions. The direct cause of death is often heart failure or kidney disease, and he said that “thorough analysis is needed”

Share

Data and statistics continue to show this trend worldwide, which is eating away at the last remaining pushed vaccine ‘benefit,’ they protect against death. The ‘vaccines’ no longer protect against infection, the ‘vaccines’ do not stop transmission, the ‘vaccines’ no longer protect against severe disease or death. (If they ever did at all). Every benefit health authorities promised you now seem to be gone.

Back to ivermectin, I do believe one of the biggest reasons it was suppressed was our laws do not allow an Emergency Use Authorization when effective treatments are available. mRNA ‘vaccines’ would have to go through the standard approval process. Pfizer would have missed out on making 100 Billion + dollars. (In 2022 alone!) I’m sure there are other reasons but that is the main one.

If only we didn’t limit ivermectin in the beginning. Ivermectin first surfaced in April 2020 as a potential treatment for COVID. How many lives could have been saved?

Thanks for reading everyone!

Leave a comment

Dr. Panda's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

A huge thank you to our paid subscribers! It’s your support that keeps this newsletter going!
If you find this newsletter enjoyable and useful please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

My apologies if you received this post 2x, a draft was sent last night in error. 😵‍💫


Twitter avatar for @hugh_mankind
New World Odor™ @hugh_mankind
Randomized Clinical Trial: Ivermectin Reduces 72% of COVID-19 Infection in Study Population Like a broken record, @PierreKory and so many others were right to propose it. It's cheap, but denying it cost the world priceless lives. trialsitenews.com/a/randomized-c…
4:29 PM ∙ Jan 6, 2023
1,911Likes956Retweets
Twitter avatar for @PeterSweden7
PeterSweden @PeterSweden7
So we now know that ivermectin and vitamin D is safe and effective against covid. Why was this censored and surpressed by the so called experts? Absolutely criminal.
6:16 PM ∙ Dec 30, 2022
30,303Likes7,791Retweets
Twitter avatar for @DanSkorbach
Dan Skorbach @DanSkorbach
6. The first study that mentioned Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID-19 was conducted in Australia in April 2020:
Image
2:44 AM ∙ Jan 8, 2023
678Likes176Retweets
Twitter avatar for @ianmSC
Ian Miller @ianmSC
Japan just reported its highest single day number of COVID deaths and set a record for their highest average number of the pandemic, despite nearly three years of universal masking & exceptionally high vaccination and booster rates Seems to be working perfectly to control COVID
Image
9:15 PM ∙ Jan 13, 2023
2,781Likes996Retweets

Share

86
Share this post

Proven Again: Ivermectin

drpanda.substack.com
28
Share
28 Comments
Share this discussion

Proven Again: Ivermectin

drpanda.substack.com
Eric
Writes The Imaginary Hobgoblin
Jan 15·edited Jan 15Liked by Dr Panda

One thing I've learned over the last few years is that if vitamins, minerals, supplements, natureopathic approaches and non-traditional therapies touting certain health benefits carry the warning: "These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA," they're definitely worthy of consideration. There's no money for the Rockefeller medical profiteers in keeping people well. People tend to forget that first and foremost the medical industry is a BUSINESS. There are good doctors, nurses, etc....within the establishment, (for every Florence Nightingale there's a Nurse Ratchet), but the administrative velociraptors that infest the large Apex Predator Hospitals are constantly monitoring the bottom line. Let that sink in.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Fred Jewett
Jan 15Liked by Dr Panda

I want to say thankyou to Dr. Panda for setting up this Substack site. I don't have a lot of respect for the average doctor's ethics and consider what they say in combination with information from other sources when I am suspicious. It is very upsetting that the medical licensing authorities and government health institutions have lined up with the pharmaceutical companies to force the jabs on the unsuspecting people. What happened to "following the science". People are dying and their deaths are traced back to the jabs. Real medical science says "stop the jabs" but the establishment continued to force the jabs and discredit the good doctors who are saying whoa, stop injecting this crap into people. So thanks Dr. Panda for being a light in a dark time! You have been spot on throughout this disaster.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply by Dr Panda
26 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Dr. Panda
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing