FDA: Risk of Heart Attack Actually Lower in the Vaccinated
FDA: Risk of Heart Attack Actually Lower in the Vaccinated
“We stand firmly behind the safety and effectiveness of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.”
Back in February, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Florida’s Surgeon General, wrote a letter to the FDA questing mRNA vaccine safety - citing a 4,400% increase in reports of life-threatening conditions in Florida following the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
You can read the full article here:
Florida has never seen this type of response following previous mass vaccination efforts pushed by the federal government.
In Florida alone, we saw a 1,700% increase in reports after the release of the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to an increase of 400% in vaccine administration for the same period.
The Report of life-threatening conditions increased 4,400%.
According to a recent study, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events, including coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries, Bell’s palsy, and encephalitis, to name a few. This risk was 1 in 550, much higher than other vaccines. To claim these vaccines are “safe and effective” while minimizing and disregarding the adverse events in unconscionable.
The CDC and the FDA responded with a four-page letter yesterday - they are doubling down on mRNA. Criticizing the 1.5+ million VAERS reports and calling them “misleading” and “harmful” to the American public.
“We stand firmly behind the safety and effectiveness of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.”
The letter accuses Dr. Ladapo of fueling mRNA vaccine hesitation instead of just accepting scientific facts.
Denying the federal government will ‘retaliate’ against healthcare providers for discussing the risks and benefits of vaccination.
We agree that communication between patients and their health care providers is critical, and fully support clear, accurate communication about the benefits and risks of medical products. It is inaccurate to suggest that the federal government will “retaliate” against any health care provider for communicating with their patients about the benefits and risks of a particular medical product.
The CDC and the FDA explained why there are more VAERS reports. It’s quite simple really. Since vaccine providers are required to report certain adverse reports - more reports are to be expected.
The Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the COVID-19 Vaccines require sponsors and vaccine providers to report certain adverse events through VAERS, so more reports should be expected.
Certain cardiovascular events were investigated by ‘cardiovascular experts’ who determined that the risk of stroke and heart attack was actually lower in the vaccinated.
Despite increased reports of these events, when the concern was examined in detail by cardiovascular experts, the risk of stroke and heart attack was actually lower in people who had been vaccinated, not higher.
Despite this, it also explains that researchers need more time to investigate. However, both agencies have found no evidence of an increased risk of death following mRNA vaccination. They praise the vaccine (for all age groups) and cite a study that estimates vaccines saved 14 million people worldwide.
We stand firmly behind the safety and effectiveness of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which are fully supported by the available scientific data. Staying up to date on vaccination is the best way to reduce the risks of death and serious illness or hospitalization from COVID-19. Misleading people by overstating the risks, or emphasizing the risks without acknowledging the overwhelming benefits, unnecessarily causes vaccine hesitation and puts people at risk of death or serious illness that could have been prevented by timely vaccination.
I encourage everyone to read the entire 4-page letter here. I will also screenshot it below.
The CDC and FDA Have Been Captured
This letter might as well have been written by Pfizer's Albert Bourla himself. Are the CDC and FDA under the control of the pharmaceutical industry?
Below is a snapshot of the 1.5+ million reports from the underreported VAERS system. These are the rare serious adverse events that are ‘outweighed’ by the vaccine. A vaccine that doesn’t even work.
If the vaccine is as good as they say it is, why not remove the liability shield?
That the FDA could even write such a thing after the unprecedented carnage dealt by these injections strongly suggests that the harm is fully intentional.
Two completely incompatible and irreconcilable realities....they both cannot be true. Someone is lying.
Could not link to the mentioned studies. As there was no mention of testing people to determine predisposition to adverse effects of mRNA vaccines the CDC and FDA have failed to establish any mitigating efforts to the adverse effects they mention in the letter. No specific mention of statistics in the letter, just bald assertions. My personal fact check is the CDC and FDA are spreading misinformation and bulls__t.